Judge Issues Gag Order Against Trump

A New York judge presiding over the hush money trial of former President Donald Trump has issued a gag order, restricting Trump from making public attacks against witnesses, jurors, and related individuals. This directive, delivered by Judge Juan Merchan, marks a significant development in the lead-up to the historic criminal trial of a former U.S. president, scheduled to commence on April 15.

While the order does not prevent Trump from criticizing Judge Merchan and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, it specifically bars him from disparaging witnesses, prosecutors, court staff, and their families in a manner that could adversely affect the trial. Judge Merchan’s decision, outlined in a four-page document, underscores the potential threat to justice posed by Trump’s prior statements.

The imposition of the gag order comes after a period of intense public commentary by Trump, wherein he lambasted various legal and judicial figures involved in his cases. His criticisms have spanned a wide array of targets, including judges, prosecutors, and even family members of those in the legal process.

Trump’s legal team has contested the gag order, arguing it infringes on his First Amendment rights, especially as he remains a key figure in the Republican presidential nomination race. However, Judge Merchan highlighted the extensive and often provocative nature of Trump’s remarks, which have necessitated increased security measures to protect those targeted.

The campaign spokesperson for Trump, Steven Cheung, criticized the gag order, framing it as an assault on the former president’s political speech and the rights of his supporters to hear from him. This gag order aligns with previous ones in Trump’s ongoing legal battles, including his New York civil fraud case and the federal criminal case in Washington, D.C., related to the 2020 election.

The enforcement of this gag order follows a pattern of legal restraints aimed at curbing Trump’s public commentary on legal proceedings, reflecting the judiciary’s effort to maintain the integrity of the legal process amidst highly charged political and legal battles.

Latest News »